May 22, 2020
An Employer of Record serves as a “go-between” for the employee and the client company when the latter expands to a new country without an existing footprint.
In order to explain the concept of an Employer of Record, it is best to turn to a relatable example.
After the initial excitement of accepting the offer, it’s time to get to business...
This piece of the employee onboarding process is typically managed by Human Resources. But in many cases, companies choose to outsource this function to a third party.
This third party is called an Employer of Record, or EOR.
An Employer of Record serves as a “go-between” for the employee and the client company when the latter expands to a new country without an existing footprint.
An EOR is often used for global expansion when a company sets up in a new country and does not have an existing footprint.
The process of registering a local legal entity can be expensive and arduous. The company may need to move swiftly in order to meet the needs of a project or new business venture. Or they only require a short term solution.
Thus, a global Employer of Record can be an efficient way of employing personnel in that country. The EOR will have a legal entity to manage local payroll, employment and immigration.
The use of EORs is typically one component of a larger Global Employment Organisation (GEO) strategy. A GEO is a service that helps companies of any size mobilise a workforce in a foreign country. The GEO will have full compliance with country and local labour laws, taxes and work permits. Additionally, they may use an EOR to manage the payroll functions for the workforce.
The GEO functions as a single point of contact for the company that is using an EOR through the GEO service. An EOR could also be an interim solution while they establish a local entity and operations.
An EOR is attractive when expanding overseas without an existing footprint. The EOR manages the risk of legal, payroll, tax and immigration violation in the host country.
Companies can ramp up operations faster than incorporating an entity in the country.
Using an EOR is also a convenient and cost-effective option for smaller companies. Especially firms without the corporate infrastructure to manage local payroll, tax and immigration.
The legal employment relationship will exist between the employee and the EOR. But the EOR has no dealings with the employee around daily work responsibilities. This direction comes from the original employer. Thus, the lines of responsibility can become somewhat “blurred” when using an EOR.
Additionally, as the employment relationship is technically between the employee and the EOR, the original employer essentially gives up control over the payroll process.
This might cause confusion if the company’s pays employees bi-weekly and the host country dictates monthly payment.
In this instance, the international employee is paid through the EOR according to the host country’s laws, and NOT the company’s payroll process.
One alternative would be to use a Professional Employment Organisation, or a PEO. They differ in that a PEO does not hold the employment relationship, and associated risk, as an EOR would.
Instead, a PEO provides guidance on local payroll, registration and compliance needs. This may include connecting a company with an Employer of Record. This would involve the company managing relationships with both the PEO and the EOR.
Another alternative would be to hire independent contractors to carry out in-country operations. Although, for long term assignments this might not be the best alternative. Independent contractors, by the very nature of the work they’ve chosen, may be more likely to change jobs frequently.
There is some crossover in the services provided by an employer of record and a staffing agency. Both will manage the temporary deployment of personnel for a client company.
However, many staffing agencies do not have the specialist in-house expertise to manage global employment contracts, laws and regulations.
A company can always opt to register an entity in-country. This process is a viable situation if funding and timescales allow. It is also an effective approach if you are planning a long term, permanent base in-country.
If you need a temporary solution while registering an entity, an EOR can be valuable. In countries with long registration periods, the EOR could temporarily assume responsibility for international employment. This can be an effective way to save time and money.
They would then transition back to the client company once an entity is established.
If you are expanding internationally, Airswift can help. We can provide integrated outsourced global employment organisation, working side-by-side with clients as an Employer of Record.
We are a truly global business with a local approach. We don't just work in the countries that we operate in - we live there
This post was written by: Liz Fiumara, Content Development Manager at Airswift
Co-employment risk: A matter of mitigation, not elimination
Re-train, re-skill, retain: an opportunity for the energy industry
What happens to employees during a merger? Avoiding M&A employment issues
Singapore Employment Amendment Bill - what do employers need to know?
A guide to the Malaysia Employment Pass work permit scheme
Why an employer branding strategy is vital for your business
How to compare Employer of Record service providers
Employment trends shaping the labour market in Malaysia
How to choose the best employment agency for your next role
Could an employer of record help with remote workforce management?